If you want to know how to write an article review, read these recommendations. Increasingly, students are faced with the task of writing a critical review of a scientific article. Through its content, one can understand how interesting the article is and whether it is worth spending time on it. Simply put, the review is a brief description of the article, which contains the essence of the research, the relevance of the topic, and the information about the author.
The most common mistake when working on such a paper is a misunderstanding of the meaning of the concept “review.” As a result, instead of a good description of the article, it turns out just a retelling of the material. The usual presentation of the text is not needed when you are creating a review.

Rules of Writing an Article Review

Writing an article review requires a serious approach. An article may be written for several years, but this does not mean at all that it is possible to create a review in two minutes. On the contrary, it is necessary to think about how the article will be initially evaluated by a critical analysis. Even buying a book in a store is made only after people have read the annotation to it; and if it is presented vividly, it may be of interest to the reader. Therefore, it is very important to understand how responsible and competent the approach to writing a task will be.
In a critical analysis, you should not indicate your opinion, using the expression: “I consider,” “in my opinion.” Moreover, it should be born in mind that the opinion changes under the influence of any circumstances. Therefore, when writing a critical review, subjective opinion is not brought to the fore.

How to Review an Article

How to review an article? If the review is written to your paper, then it is much easier work because the content is familiar to you. In this case, it is not difficult to make a brief description of your work. Without any doubts, it is also necessary to remember that it is not worth expressing an opinion about your (of course, brilliant) article. Let your readers evaluate your masterpiece. Moreover, the own statement of your opinion will take a certain number of words in the critical analysis essay. However, it is possible to present the opinion of people who have read this article.
To get an interesting paper, you should not use popular linguistic clichés, as they can distract the reader and make a negative impression. In addition, the use of scientific terms that may be incomprehensible to the uninitiated person is not worth it. Your sentences should be based on the principle of brevity. The work should be clear to any audience. You can indicate which category of readers the article is aimed at.

The Structure of Your Critical Review

The review is a summary of the article, a description of the research, but in no case it is a retelling of its content. Its task, having designated the basic directions in work, is to unite them in a single whole and to express in the short thesis. Like any text, the review should have its own structure. It should consist of three sections (the relevance of the problem, ways to solve it, conclusions and results). It is desirable to express these sections in three sentences.

The Content of The Paper

It is not necessary to include the title of the article in the review; it is already known to the reader. It hardly makes sense to quote here and make polemics with opponents. It is recommended not to include material that is not presented in the article, and exaggerate your own writing merits. The text should be strict and concise. Avoid emotional judgments, personal opinion, and other kinds of subjectivism. The text should not contain unnecessary introductory words. Results and conclusions should be presented as briefly, clearly, and informatively as possible. It should not be forgotten that a review of a scientific article can also be used without the main text in the form of brief information about it in various information reference books. Therefore, it is necessary to write in such a way that it will be possible to present the essence of the problem described in the article.
The article review is its brief description, which is taking into account the characteristics of the presentation of the material, form, and content. This paper should include a definition of the main topic, problems of a scientific article, the goals of the work, and the results. The specifics of writing a critical analysis of the article are shown in several phrases:

  1. The main semantic and actual content of the material, its relevance. In other words, it is necessary to describe the article so that the reader decides whether he or she needs to read the full text.
  2. Presentation of the material, emphasizing its relevance and advantages over other sources.

The Article Review Writing Rules

Your work on the text should be guided by the following principles:

  1. Meaningfulness. It is desirable that the reader can understand the review of a scientific article, which is far from the proposed subject. Therefore the text should be as clear as possible, without the use of special terms and narrowly focused concepts.
  2. Citations. It is allowed to cite the author without excesses if it is relevant in the context.

The competence of the person who is creating a brief review of the article depends on the relevance of the material, so preliminary preparation, structuring, and the absence of errors of any nature are imperative when writing your text. Examples of well-written papers can be easily found on the Internet. The properly presented essay is not only an informative text but also promotional material, which can attract more scientists.
It is expedient to describe the methodology only if it contains novelty and is of interest from the perspective of the submitted article. The results of the work must be described accurately and informatively. The basic theoretical and experimental findings, actual data, revealed interconnections and regularities must be given here. You should give preference to new results and long-term data, important discoveries, conclusions that refute existing theories, as well as data that, in the author's opinion, are of practical importance.

Useful Phrases for Writing an Article Review

  • this article addresses the issue;
  • it justifies the idea that;
  • the article touches upon the topic;
  • the article is devoted to a comprehensive study;
  • the purpose of the article is to analyze the study;
  • the article is devoted to the phenomenon;
  • the article reveals the problem;
  • particular attention is paid to the;
  • the article analyzes;
  • the author concludes that the;
  • the author focuses the main attention on the;
  • the article clarified the features;
  • based on the study;
  • this paper presents the problem;
  • researchers highlight such arguments;
  • the author describes the main issues;
  • this article helps to understand the basic principles;
  • the value of this study is.
Prev Next